National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (NCSSLE) (2024)

An extensive amount of research investigates how positive school environments can impact academic outcomes, student attendance, and graduation rates. Academic achievement can be influenced by a combination of factors related to the physical space and quality of schools as well as students and staffs’ emotional well-being. Youth development flourishes when education, public health, and school health collaborate on common goals aligned with a whole child approach to education.

Staff well-being and burnout are two priority areas that greatly impact learning environment for children. Research shows that the student perception of teacher happiness can be linked to students’ overall attitude and motivation. Peer support and teacher support are also strongly tied to positive school climate and academic achievement.

In general, for students to achieve academic success they must attend and be engaged in school, and a school environment can influence both attendance and engagement. School discipline policies that emphasize relational or restorative, as opposed to punitive, justice and are considered clear, fair, and consistently enforced by students are related to higher student attendance rates and levels of engagement. Relational responses to student behaviors are sensitive, individualized, and emphasize character strengths as a means of shifting the focus from the student’s behavior to root causes of behavior. This is a common practice within schools with positive climate. Such responses rely upon staff member’s positive relationships with students to understand the current situation and be positioned as a trusted mentor in the student’s eyes.

For example, some evidence shows that teacher burnout is associated with worse academic achievement and lowered student motivation. Indicators of poor school environment include low levels of teacher satisfaction, high rates of teacher turnover, low academic expectations, and a messy or unsafe physical place.

Furthermore, a strong link exists between exclusionary policies—suspension, expulsion, and forced transfers—and high school dropout. Students missed over 11 million days of school in 2015-16 because of suspensions. Students with disabilities and students of color are disproportionately impacted by exclusionary discipline practices. Studies have shown that more severe exclusionary discipline has a consistent negative effect on many other long-term education outcomes for students.

Anderson, K. P. (2020). Academic, attendance, and behavioral outcomes of a suspension reduction policy: Lessons for school leaders and policy makers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(3), 435-471.

Battistich, V., & Horn, A. (1997). The relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1997–2001.

Boccanfuso, B., & Kuhfeld, M. (2011). Multiple responses, promising results: Evidence-based, nonpunitive alternatives to zero tolerance. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 23-30.

Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2009). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Whole school, whole community, whole child: A collaborative approach to learning and health. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Available at https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/wscc/WSCCmodel_update_508tagged.pdf.

Chang, L. (2003). Variable effects of children’s aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial leadership as a function of teacher beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 74(2), 535-548.

Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. M. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 325-339.

100(9), 1701-1707.

Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, teacher education and practice. Teachers’ College Record, 111, 180-213.

Davis, J. E., & Jordan, W. T. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high school. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 570-587.

Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In C. Ames & R. E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.

Fairless, M. E., Somers, C. L., Goutman, R. L., Kevern, C. A., Pernice, F. M., & Barnett, D. (2021). Adolescent Achievement: Relative Contributions of Social Emotional Learning, Self-efficacy, and Microsystem Supports.Education and Urban Society,53(5), 561-584.

Fenzel, M. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Educating at-risk urban African American children: The effects of school climate on motivation and academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Fuligni, A. J. (1997). The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: The role of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Development, 68(2), 351-363.

Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic Emphasis of Urban Elementary Schools and Student Achievement in Reading and Mathematics: A Multilevel Analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683-683.

Gottfredson, G., & Gottfredson, D. (2001). What schools do to prevent problem behavior and promote safe environments. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(4), 313-344.

Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1349-1363.

Hallinger, P., & Bickman, L. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527-527.

Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356.

Hoy, W. K., & Hannum, J. W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290-290.

Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., Meehan, B. T., Zhang, D., & Collie, C. (2005). Adverse School Context Moderates the Outcomes of Selective Interventions for Aggressive Children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 731-736.

Kendziora, K., Osher, D., & Chinen, M. (2008). Student connection research: Final narrative report to the Spencer Foundation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research

Klem, A., & Connell, J. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262-273.

Lee, V. E. (1999). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-192.

Lee, V., Smith, J., Perry, T., & Smylie, M. A. (1999). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

LiCalsi, C., Osher, D., & Bailey, P. (2021). An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Suspension and Suspension Severity on Behavioral and Academic Outcomes. American Institutes for Research, Available at https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/NYC-Suspension-Effects-Behavioral-Academic-Outcomes-August-2021.pdf.

Losen, D. J., & Whitaker, A. (11). million days lost: Race, discipline, and safety at US public schools (Part 1).Center for Civil Rights Remedies of UCLA’s Civil Rights Project and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Ma, X., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2002). The Development of Science Achievement in Middle and High School: Individual Differences and School Effects. Evaluation Review, 26(4), 395-395.

Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes.International journal of educational research,105, 101714.

MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84.

Mayer, G. R. (2001). Antisocial behavior: Its causes and prevention within our schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 414-429.

McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting student connectedness to school: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health, 72(4), 138-146.

Moskowitz, S., & Dewaele, J. M. (2021). Is teacher happiness contagious? A study of the link between perceptions of language teacher happiness and student attitudes.Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching,15(2), 117-130.

Nelson, J. R., Martella, R. M., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136-148.

Osher, D., Bear, G., Sprague, J., & Doyle, W. (2010). How we can improve school discipline. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 48-58.

Osher, D., Cartledge, G., Oswald, D., Artiles, A. J., & Coutinho, M. (2004). Issues of cultural and linguistic competency and disproportionate representation. In R. Rutherford, M. Quinn & S. Mather (Eds.), Handbook of research in behavioral disorders (pp. 54-77). New York: Guilford Press.

Osher, D., Dwyer, K., & Jimerson, S. R. (2006). Safe, supportive, and effective schools. In S. R. Jimerson & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 51-72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Osher, D., & Kendziora, K. (2010). Building Conditions for Learning and Healthy Adolescent Development: Strategic Approaches. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Prevention Science. New York: Routledge

Osher, D. M., Sandler, S., & Nelson, C. M. (2002). The best approach to safety is to fix schools and support children and staff. In D. Skiba & G. G. Noam (Eds.), Zero Tolerance: Can Suspension and Expulsion Keep Schools Safe?: New Directions for Youth Development, Number 92. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ripski, M. B., & Gregory, A. (Oct-Dec2009). Unfair, Unsafe, and Unwelcome: Do High School Students’ Perceptions of Unfairness, Hostility, and Victimization in School Predict Engagement and Achievement? . Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 355-375.

Rumberger, R. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 583-625.

Rumberger, R., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review of 25 Years of Research. Santa Barbara, CA: California Dropout Research Project.

Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437-460.

Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27-46.

Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Roehlkepartain, E. C., Sesma, A., & van Dulmen, M. (2006). The role of developmental assets in predicting academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 691-708.

Scales, P. C., & Benson, P. L. (2007). Building Developmental Assets to encourage students' school success. Instructional Leader (Texas Elementary Principals and Supervisors Association), 20(3), 1-3, 8-10, 12.

Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: International comparisons between Korea, Japan, and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520-537.

Skiba, R., & Rausch, M. K. (2004). The Relationship between Achievement, Discipline, and Race: An Analysis of Factors Predicting ISTEP Scores. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.

Stewart, E. B. (2007). Individual and School Structural Effects on African American High School Students' Academic Achievement. High School Journal, 91(2), 16-34.

Stewart, E. B. (2008). School Structural Characteristics, Student Effort, Peer Associations, and Parental Involvement: The Influence of School- and Individual-Level Factors on Academic Achievement. Education & Urban Society, 40(2), 179-204.

Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School Characteristics and Educational Outcomes: Toward an Organizational Model of Student Achievement in Middle Schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703-703.

US Department of Education (ED). (2016, July 11). School Climate and Discipline: Know the Data. Laws & Guidance. Available at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/data.html

National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (NCSSLE) (2024)

FAQs

What is the National Center for Safe Supportive Learning Environments Ncssle? ›

The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments (NCSSLE) is a training and technical assistance (TTA) center funded by the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Safe and Healthy Students to help address the many factors that result in disciplinary problems and affect conditions for learning, such as ...

What is standard 4 create and maintain supportive and safe learning environments? ›

Standard Four: Create and Maintain Supportive and Safe Learning Environments. The classroom should be a safe environment where all students feel comfortable. Teachers play a major role in shaping the culture that is created within a classroom going beyond the physical environment.

What is a safe supportive learning environment? ›

Safe and supportive environments are characterized by the absence of discrimination, intimidation, taunting, harassment, and bullying. The school environment is shaped by a number of factors, including: district and school policies and practices; school structure and decision-making processes; and.

How can schools promote a safe and supportive learning environment? ›

Schools can promote safe and supportive environments by: Providing professional development for teachers, including those who teach sexual health education, on classroom management techniques. Providing professional development for all school staff on policies and practices that support all youth, including LGBTQ youth.

What are the values of AICS schools? ›

At the AICS, important values underpin our work. They include diversity, integrity, inquiry and community. These values embody who we are and they are the starting point for achieving our goal, which is to provide our students with the highest possible quality of teaching and learning.

What are the three components of safe and supportive classrooms? ›

Keep in mind that both are critical while considering these three pillars of a safe classroom environment.
  • Building Trust Between Teachers and Students. ...
  • Supporting Students' Needs Through Classroom Arrangement. ...
  • Respecting Student Differences and Personal Boundaries.

What are 5 strategies to create a healthy and supportive school environment? ›

Creating a Healthy and Supportive School Environment
  • Developing the skills to recognize and manage emotions.
  • Learning to set and achieve positive goals.
  • Learning to appreciate the perspectives of others.
  • Establishing and maintaining positive relationships.
  • Making responsible decisions.

What is the 4 C's teaching framework? ›

Long heralded as key competencies for 21st-century learners, the ”Four Cs” (Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration) are often embraced in theory yet stump educators in practice.

What are the key components of a safe learning environment? ›

A safe learning environment is focused on academic achievement, maintaining high standards, fostering positive relationships between staff and students, and encouraging parental and community involvement. Resolving conflict and preventing violence are important factors in creating a safe learning environment.

How can teachers create a supportive learning environment for students? ›

13 ways to create a positive classroom environment
  1. Build positive relationships. ...
  2. Arrange the physical environment. ...
  3. Set high academic expectations. ...
  4. Provide positive reinforcement. ...
  5. Be open to feedback. ...
  6. Encourage collaboration. ...
  7. Use current curriculum and teaching methods. ...
  8. Be there for them.
Feb 3, 2023

What is an example of safe environment? ›

A safe and secure environment is one in which the population has the freedom to pursue daily activities without fear of politically motivated, persistent, or large-scale violence.

What does a supportive classroom look like? ›

A supportive and equitable environment in all classrooms serves as a platform for all academic, social and emotional learning. At the core of a supportive classroom is a caring, engaging teacher who establishes authentic trusting relationships with each student.

What does a safe classroom environment look like? ›

A safe classroom environment is one where learners feel physically, emotionally, and socially comfortable. They know that their needs are taken care of and that they are protected by caring and thoughtful teachers and members of their community.

What is the National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational System? ›

The National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (NCCRESt) provides technical assistance and professional development to close the achievement gap between students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and their peers, and reduce inappropriate referrals to special education.

What is the National Center on Intensive Intervention? ›

The National Center on Intensive Intervention's (NCII) mission is to build district and school capacity to support implementation of intensive intervention, or data-based individualization, in reading, mathematics, and behavior for students with severe and persistent learning and/or behavioral needs.

Is ESF an international school? ›

The English Schools Foundation (ESF) is the largest English-medium international school organisation in Hong Kong.

Why is it important to create a safe learning environment? ›

When setting up any lesson that deals with potentially sensitive subjects, it's essential to begin by creating a safe, secure learning environment. This will help children feel confident to share their ideas, values and attitudes without fear of negative feedback from their peers.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mr. See Jast

Last Updated:

Views: 5520

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mr. See Jast

Birthday: 1999-07-30

Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

Phone: +5023589614038

Job: Chief Executive

Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.